Click here to see a list of books about
Blythburgh
Click here to
see some old photographs of Blythburgh
A Short History of Blythburgh
The surrounding landscape is rich in archaeological sites dating
from Neolithic to Roman times. Blythburgh itself is an Anglo-Saxon
foundation. Christianity came to Suffolk early in the seventh
century and Blythburgh was one of its most important centres.
Indeed, it may have been the location of the Anglian Episcopal seat
generally assumed to be at Dunwich. By 654 Blythburgh had a church
to which, according to tradition, the bodies of the Anglian King
Anna and his son Jurmin were brought after they fell at Bulcamp in
battle with the Mercian Penda. The church could have been one of
King Ælfwald’s Minsters (he died in 749). The finding of an
eighth-century writing tablet in Blythburgh suggests a literate
Christian presence at that time. Certainly Blythburgh was for
centuries the local centre of authority. Major criminals were
punished there and, for all the
commer
cial importance of
Dunwich, its merchants had to go to Blythburgh to change
money.
At the time of the Norman Conquest in 1066 Blythburgh was part
of the royal estate. It was one of Suffolk’s twelve market towns.
Its church was especially rich, worth ten times the average for
Suffolk, one of the wealthiest counties in England. There were two
unendowed daughter churches. Blythburgh must have had considerable
wealth and influence.
Around 1120 Henry I granted Blythburgh church to the Augustinian
canons of St Osyth’s Priory in Essex. This was presumably the rich
Minster church and not one of its unendowed dependents. The present
parish church probably descended from one of these. There were
canons at Blythburgh by 1147. The priory was never very large but
by the end of the thirteenth century it owned land or rents in
about 40 Suffolk parishes. In 1407, when the priory was in decline,
there were seven resident brothers, including the prior. Before
1350 the number could have been in double figures.
The start of decline
Blythburgh, located within a rich agricultural area and on an
important road at the lowest crossing on the river Blyth, no doubt
continued to prosper through the twelfth and thirteenth centuries
into the beginning of the fourteenth. Whether Blythburgh was ever a
significant port is doubtful. It is easy to confuse such activity
at nearby Walberswick (in the same manor and closer to the sea)
with Blythburgh itself. Even Walberswick had to reach agreement
with its powerful neighbour Dunwich, in its heyday in command of
the mouth of the river, before it could fish and trade with its own
ships. In any case sea-going of any size vessels would probably
have been unsuited to the narrow twisting channel leading upstream
to Blythburgh. Nevertheless, in 1327 the community was the 21st
richest in Suffolk, ranked below Beccles and Dunwich locally, but
above Lowestoft, Southwold, and Halesworth. The Black Death, which
reached East Anglia in 1349, was a turning point. The impact of the
loss of population and the social and economic disruption that
followed can be seen in the tax returns of 1449. Blythburgh, like
many other Suffolk communities (but not Walberswick) was granted
tax relief because it was less populous and prosperous than it had
been more than one hundred years earlier. Perhaps Blythburgh
suffered more than its neighbour because it was a thoroughfare town
enjoying an income from passing travellers. Decay is also evident
from the accounts of the Lord of the Manor, John Hopton, who
succeeded in 1430 and died in 1478. Living at what is now Westwood
Lodge, he had a flock of 700 sheep, took 1000 rabbits annually from
his warren, and fattened bullocks. But of his annual income of
about £300, only £40 came from his Suffolk estate and his tolls
from the local market had dwindled to almost nothing. By 1490 there
was only one stall.
Paradoxically, in this period of apparently straightened
circumstances, Blythburgh church was rebuilt. The prior obtained a
licence to rebuild in 1412 and by 1480 the project was complete.
The great new church, which retained an existing fourteenth-century
tower, does not reflect either a large or especially rich
community. It is not a ‘wool’ church - John Hopton’s flock was not
particularly large and east Suffolk played only a minor role in
cloth production – if anything, apart from fishing, it was butter
and cheese country. Clearly, there was money around, although the
slow pace of building meant that spending could be spread over many
years. We don’t know how much John Hopton contributed but his was
Yorkshire rather than Suffolk money. The church’s size, its
extensive stained glass (now almost all gone) and its furnishings,
reflected less the wealth of the community as a whole than the
deliberately conspicuous expenditure of individuals who wished to
be remembered after their deaths. They relied upon the prayers of
the living to speed their souls through purgatory to salvation:
their spending was, as one writer has put it, a form of post-mortem
fire insurance.
Dramatic change
The sixteenth century brought great changes. The early years may
have been ones of optimism. The White Hart inn was built (or
perhaps rebuilt). Its fine moulded ceiling survives in the bar
although much of the building’s timber frame has gone, to be
replaced at one end by a red brick ‘Dutch’ gable (high fashion when
it was added in the seventeenth century), and by a
nineteenth-century façade facing the road. Blythburgh held its
position in the table of Suffolk communities’ taxable wealth –
listed at 19th in 1524, although the possibility that those
assessments lagged behind reality, as they had done in the
fifteenth century, must be remembered. But great changes were
imminent. The suppression of Blythburgh priory was authorised by
the Pope in 1528 to contribute to the foundation of Cardinal
College, Ipswich, by Cardinal Wolsey, although his disgrace and
death brought a reprieve until 1537. Then King Henry VIII
suppressed the priory. The prior received a small pension but the
handful of remaining priors got nothing. The priory was by then
poor, worth a little over £8 including £2 for five horses and an
old cart. Its properties had suffered after the Black Death and
some had been lost to the sea by coastal erosion. In real terms the
institution was less wealthy at its suppression than it had been
250 years before.
There were also dramatic changes to the parish church. With the
Protestant ascendancy and royal edict came, from the late 1540s,
the removal of altars and images, the whitening of walls, the
smashing of glass (although much stained glass is known to have
survived in Blythburgh until at least 1660), and the surrender to
the King’s commissioners of the accumulation of generations of
pious benefactions. A powerful storm in 1577 added to the
discomfiture of worshippers. During a service the church was struck
by lightning, killing two people and damaging the spire.
At its suppression the priory’s properties were granted to
Walter Wadelond of Needham Market and in 1548 reverted to the
Hopton family, being combined with the Blythburgh manor they
already owned. The Hoptons’ time in Blythburgh was however
approaching its end. In 1592 they sold the Blythburgh, Walberswick
and Westleton manors to Alderman Robert Brooke, a successful London
grocer. He also bought the Hoptons’ Yoxford estate with Cockfield
Hall. This became the seat of his son, also Robert, from 1602. From
that date Blythburgh’s major landowner lived outside the parish.
Westwood Lodge park was immediately let and the house followed in
1614. Later in the same century the estate passed to the Blois
family (they had been Ipswich mercers and chandlers - like the
Brookes founding a landed family on a sixteenth-century trading
fortune) through the marriages of Sir William Blois (1626-75). His
first wife was Martha Brooke, and his second Jane, widow and
heiress of his brother-in-law, John Brooke.
In the seventeenth century Blythburgh’s physical and economic
decline gathered pace. William Dowsing visited the church in April
1644 and with puritan zeal smashed crosses and carvings, figures
and glass. Blythburgh’s patron, Sir Robert Brooke, who also had
puritan inclinations, no doubt supported this action. The story
that Cromwell’s soldiers tethered their horses in the church and
peppered the angels in the roof with shot from their muskets is
however less credible. Studies of the lead shot, of a type not
known in Dowsing’s time, and noting payments by the churchwardens
many years later for the shooting of jackdaws in the church,
provide a more likely explanation for the damage. The Archdeacon’s
parochial visitation of 1663 found a church falling into disrepair
and disuse. There had been no communion for the past twelve years.
The scourge of windswept timber and thatch towns – fire – also
visited Blythburgh. That of 1676 was especially damaging. Some
inhabitants, unable to or thinking it not worth rebuilding their
properties, moved elsewhere. Few village buildings of before that
calamitous date now survive. In 1754 there were only 21 households
and a population of 124.
Decay in an expanding world
Symbols of burgeoning economic development and prosperity in the
eighteenth century passed through Blythburgh rather than involved
it directly. The Blyth navigation between Southwold and Halesworth
was completed in 1761. The drainage of the adjacent marshes
continued apace and grazing cattle replaced wildfowl and wader. A
new turnpike road carved its way through the centre of the village
in 1785, some of the remaining fabric of the priory being used in
its foundations. The old main road that had meandered past the
church was thus bypassed, and became a quiet backwater. The site of
the old market place between the church and the new road was
forgotten. A more forbidding symbol of population increase,
unemployment and grinding poverty, was the opening in 1766 of
Bulcamp House of Industry, designed to house 400 paupers from 46
parishes and one township in the Blything Hundred. It became a
feared workhouse in the nineteenth century, with over 550 inmates
in the 1820s. Even in the twentieth century, after it had become a
hospital, some old people still dreaded the thought of going
there.
Blythburgh’s population rose rapidly, peaking in 1851 at 1,118,
including the workhouse. Farming in Blythburgh had a high
reputation. In 1813 Westwood Lodge was described by the
agricultural commentator Arthur Young as ‘without exception the
finest farm in the county’. For the Suffolk farm labourers the
picture was less rosy. Children worked in the fields from the age
of six and wages were very low in comparison with other counties.
In 1850 an adult’s wage was only 73% of the English county average.
Educational opportunity arrived relatively late in Blythburgh, even
for Suffolk, whose clergy and landed gentry were castigated by a
contemporary writer for their indifference and neglect. Blythburgh
had had a Dame school but the village school only opened in 1875,
finally closing in 1964.
If Blythburgh’s population worshipped at all, the majority were
to be found at the Primitive Methodist Chapel in Dunwich Road,
built in 1837. The neglected parish church continued to moulder
into decay, completing the destruction of the medieval glass
started by the sixteenth and seventeenth-century iconoclasts; many
of the church records were burnt in the church stove. In 1881 the
Bishop of Norwich deemed the fabric to be unsafe and closed the
church.
The decay of Blythburgh
church is not surprising. The raison d’être for its
great size and lavish display ended in the sixteenth century
with the Reformation and new attitudes to purgatory and the
saving of souls. The poor populations of the eighteenth and
nineteenth century could not afford to reverse the
depredations of the iconoclasts and years of neglect, even if
they had wished to do so. The non-resident patrons also had
problems of their own. Cockfield Hall was in the hands of
trustees in the late eighteenth century while gambling debts
were settled, and in the nineteenth century the miserly eighth
baronet had twelve expensive children coupled with an agnostic
attitude towards religion.
Transformation
Although Blythburgh church came close to sharing the fates of
Covehithe and Walberswick whose equally imposing structures fell
into ruin and were drastically reduced to suit their small
congregations, poverty and indifference were ultimately the
saviours of Blythburgh’s medieval fabric. Given leadership and
money, the church would no doubt have been heavily restored in the
nineteenth century. It took a national campaign in the 1880s to
repair and reopen the church but a controversy over the extent to
which it should be restored was long and heated. A scheme drawn up
by the architect G. E. Street, favoured by the local building
committee, led by the determined incumbent, Henry Sykes, appalled
the Society for the Preservation of Ancient Buildings, founded by
William Morris. Morris had many highly placed supporters, and the
ear of the patron, and argued for preservation not restoration. But
he failed to impose his ideas upon Blythburgh and the SPAB
eventually walked away in disgust. Nevertheless, by influencing
potential benefactors against the local plans, the SPAB may have
made it more difficult to raise money and so stayed the hands of
over-zealous restorers.
The local building committee included some prominent artists,
reflecting the long established attraction of the Blyth valley to
painters. The Royal Academicians Ernest Crofts and Sir John Seymour
Lucas had homes in the village. They considerably altered and
extended modest buildings, probably of the seventeenth-century, to
create their picturesque houses ‘The Green’ and ‘The Priory’. Thus
the invasion of the area by incomers, seeking weekend or retirement
homes, that became obvious in the late twentieth century, had its
origins almost one hundred years earlier.
The Southwold Railway, opened in 1879, gave Blythburgh a station
and a hump-backed bridge to carry the main road over its tracks.
For fifty years the railway provided access to the main line at
Halesworth in one direction and the sea at Southwold in the other.
Blythburgh never had cause to complain about its communications.
But the national rail network dealt a mortal blow to the river
navigation. By the start of the twentieth century commercial
traffic had ceased. And the river flooded back over the marshes
downstream of Blythburgh to recreate a wildlife habitat later
designated as a National Nature Reserve.
As twentieth-century society became more mobile, and the pattern
of employment in agriculture changed, local services declined. In
the nineteen-twenties Blythburgh still had, in addition to the
White Hart, an off-licence, a post office, a general store, a shoe
maker, a shoe-repairer, a dairy, and a
carpenter/wheelwright/decorator who could also provide you with a
coffin and bury you. By the end of the century only the White Hart
remained, together with the post office, soon to be rehoused in a
rejuvenated village store. The Reading Room had also gone – the
coup de grâce administered, it has been said, by the first
transmissions of Independent TV. The abandoned Primitive Methodist
chapel was a forlorn sight. The village hall, however, once the
domain of the Women’s Institute and now transferred to the
community, was to be restored to maintain and improve its
attraction as a focal point for Blythburgh’s active societies. The
onetime Bulcamp workhouse was in the process of conversion into
expensive private dwellings. And the church still commanded the
valley, as it and its predecessors had done for over 1,300 years.
However, it now looked upon a very different village and
landscape.
Further reading
The list of useful sources is quite long. They are given in
‘Writing about Blythburgh history. A select bibliography’, no. 14
in the Blythburgh Society’s series of Blyth Valley History
Notes.
Alan Mackley, Blythburgh, September
2001.