We know, from a survey before his fall in
1547, that the 3rd Duke of Norfolk had pulled down the old chancel
with its two aisles and had partly built another one. This was the
start of the existing magnificent structure, but because of the
fall of the House of Howard it was Edward VI himself who ordered
the completion in 1553. The building is unusual because little
church construction was being carried out at this time of great
uncertainty. It was only in cases of specific requirement - here to
provide a mausoleum for Howard tombs - that intending builders
would risk the changing requirements of Catholic or Protestant
doctrine. The windows are as they were originally inserted except
for the large east window itself which was set up in 1743 by the
rector, James Brooke.
We will imagine that we are walking clockwise around the chancel
beginning in the north.
The first is the
coloured alabaster tomb against the north wall of the chancel.
This commemorates Henry Earl of Surrey and his
wife Frances de Vere, daughter of the l5th Earl of Oxford.
Surrey was born in 1517 at the house of his father,
the 3rd Duke of Norfolk, at Kenninghall. His classical
education at the hands of scholars and his study of Virgil
later gave him a poetical talent two hundred years ahead of
his time. He is to this day referred to as `The Poet Earl'. In
his youth he found favour with King Henry VIII and formed a
deep friendship with the Duke of Richmond. In later years
Surrey inherited his father's military genius in a
tactical sense and distinguished himself at
Boulogne and Landrecy. His pride of ancestry and his
foolhardiness in the dangerous days at the close of Henry
VIII's reign left him open to the intrigues of those who
plotted for the court supremacy which would come after the
King's death. Surrey was tried for treason on
fabricated charges at Guildhall on l3th January 1547 and
executed on the 2lst.
Frances de Vere and Henry Howard were betrothed when they were both
15. She does not appear to a large extent in the history of the
time, perhaps being overshadowed by the circumstances revolving
round the great family into which she had married. After
Surrey was executed she was `relieved' of the upbringing
of her children, their care being entrusted to the Duchess of
Richmond. During the reign of Edward VI Frances
married Thomas Steyning of Woodbridge and they
lived at Earl Soham Lodge, in the neighbouring village to
Framlingham. She gave birth to a daughter, Mary, and died at Earl
Soham in 1577 but was buried at Framlingham.
Following his execution in 1547, the Earl of Surrey's remains were
buried at All
Hallows church in
Tower Street , London . Before his own
death in 1613 Henry Earl of Northampton ,
Surrey 's youngest son, made provision for his
father's body to be removed to Framlingham and the present
memorial erected in 1614. By 1976 the structure was in a very
bad state of repair and funds were made available to restore
the monument to something like its original form. There is
nothing religious about the tomb, in contrast to the finer
monuments to other members of Surrey 's family
within the church. The Latin inscription refers to
Surrey being the son of `The Second Duke'. This,
although confusing, is strictly correct for, after the Battle
of Bosworth, the dukedom was rendered extinct and the Second
Duke became the First of the new creation, and so on. However,
genealogically, the line is taken as unbroken from John
Howard, lst Duke of Norfolk.
The effigies at the foot of the tomb represent, at
Surrey 's feet, Thomas who became 4th Duke of Norfolk and
at his side Northampton . At their parents' head are
the daughters, Jane, wearing a coronet, who became Countess of
Westmoreland; in the centre Katherine, who married Henry Lord
Berkeley; and Margaret, who married Henry Lord Scrope of
Bolton .
After the death of the 3rd Duke in 1554, it was his grandson, elder
son of the beheaded Poet Earl, who succeeded as 4th Duke of
Norfolk. He became involved in a number of plots during the reign
of Queen Elizabeth, many of which were concerned with Mary Queen of
Scots. Norfolk was a widower three times and it was
his attempts to marry again, this time to the Queen of Scots
herself, which cost him his head. He was executed on Tower Hill
on 2nd June 1572 and was buried at St
Peter-ad-Vincula where his body still lies.
Next is the small altar tomb which
commemorates Elizabeth, the infant daughter of the 4th Duke by his
marriage to Margaret Audley. The ogee arch is upon pilasters and is
crocketed with a finial. In the front are two plain shields between
Ionic pilasters and on each side is a plain lozenge
The tomb in the
north-east corner of the chancel commemorates two of the wives
of Thomas, 4th Duke of Norfolk. He first married Mary
FitzAlan, heiress after her father's death to the Arundel
estates. She died after a year of marriage having given birth
to Philip, Earl of Arundel, who was canonised in 1970 for
refusing to renounce his Roman Catholicism under Elizabeth I.
It is from this marriage that the present Duke of Norfolk
takes his name of `FitzAlan-Howard' and why his seat is at
Arundel. Mary FitzAlan was never buried at Framlingham but
first at the church of St
Clements-without-Temple Bar and then, under the
direction of her grandson's Will, at Arundel.
Norfolk 's second marriage was to another
heiress, Margaret daughter of Thomas Lord Audley of Walden. She
also died young and was buried at St John the Baptist's church
at Norwich . Whether, and, if so, when, her remains
were re-interred at Framlingham is uncertain. In 1842 this vault
was opened and found to be empty but for a skull and some ashes.
Tradition has it that the inhabitants of the town hid some of their
valuables in the tomb during the Rebellion of 1745 and swept it
clean. It thus remains a mystery as to what contents there were. It
would seem more probable that Margaret's body would have been
reburied at Arundel in preference to Framlingham by this time.
Margaret's children by her marriage to Norfolk were
two boys and two girls.
The tomb has a fine display of heraldic quarterings and the
effigies are shown in their robes of state. They rest their heads
and feet on emblems connected with their Houses. It would seem that
at some former period there were columns which supported a canopy
over the tomb, which must have rendered it highly magnificent. It
has been suggested that the large space between the effigies was
reserved for Norfolk 's third wife or himself or even
perhaps Mary Queen of Scots. Conjecture is tantalising!
Norfolk 's third wife plays no part in the
story of St Michael's. She was a widow when she married Thomas
Howard, her late husband being Thomas, 4th Lord Dacre of
Gillesland. However, Norfolk made remarkable marriage
plans whereby Elizabeth 's three daughters became the
wives of the sons from Howard's first two marriages. Thus Anne
Dacre married Philip Earl of Arundel; Mary Dacre married Thomas who
was created Earl of Suffolk (his descendants bear the title today)
and Elizabeth Dacre married William Howard whose descendant was the
ancestor of the present Earl of Carlisle.
Immediately to the north of the high
altar is the tomb of Henry FitzRoy, Duke
of
Richmond and
Somerset , KG, and his wife. This tomb was indeed at
Thetford, for Richmond died in 1536. He was the
illegitimate son of Henry VIII, his mother being Elizabeth
Blount, one of the ladies-in-waiting to Katherine of
Aragon . The King promoted FitzRoy to high honours
and titles for he was the only son who survived more than a
few days of life, apart, of course, from the future Edward VI
who was not born until ten years after Richmond
died. In his desire to promote the interests of his family,
the 3rd Duke of Norfolk had arranged with the King that his
daughter Mary should become Richmond 's wife.
The couple were betrothed but due to their tender years did
not live together and the consummation of the marriage was
prevented by the early death from consumption of
Richmond when he was only 17. The responsibility for
FitzRoy's burial was placed upon Norfolk by the
King who seems to have lost interest in his son, once dead.
After the dissolution of Thetford, the tomb and its body were
brought to Framlingham and Mary Richmond, Norfolk
's daughter, was buried therein after her death in December
1557.
The scenes on the frieze
are all from the Old Testament. On the north side are: the
birth of Eve; God giving the Garden in charge of Adam and Eve;
the Temptation; and the Expulsion. On the west: the nursing of
Cain and Abel, and Adam digging; Cain and Abel sacrificing,
and Cain killing Abel. On the south side are: Noah's
Ark ; the drunkenness of Noah; Abraham and the
Angels; and Lot escaping from Sodom
and Gomorrah . On the east are Abraham and
Isaac; and Moses and the Tables, and the Israelites
sacrificing to the Golden Calf.
Close by the Richmond tomb is the outline of a small
door which was the private entrance of noblemen from the
castle.
The most outstanding
monument amongst all those at Framlingham is the tomb of
Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk. This stands immediately to
the south of the high altar. Archeologically it bears
comparison with anything in northern Europe if
not perhaps in Italy . Around the four sides are
the figures of the twelve Apostles together with Aaron and
St Paul . On the south side there are St Matthew, St
James the Great, St James the Less and St Andrew; on the west
St Peter, Aaron and St Paul; on the north St Matthias, St
Jude, St Simon and St Philip; and on the east St John, St
Simeon(?) and St Thomas. These represent the last major
display of religious imagery in England before
the full weight of Reformation theology made such things
impossible.
The design of the tomb is part-French and part-English and it is
significant that it was commissioned, not by the Crown, but on
behalf of the greatest nobleman in England . It is
thought that parts, at least, of this tomb may have been
incorporated in another which was at Thetford for Thomas Howard,
2nd Duke of Norfolk victor of Flodden . In turn, this
man's father had been John Howard who had died fighting for Richard
III at Bosworth and for whom the Norfolk dukedom had
been created in the Howard name. It is known that there are two
other male bodies interred in the 3rd Duke's tomb and it is an
unproven supposition that these are the bodies of his father and
grandfather, removed to Framlingham after the dissolution of
Thetford Priory.
Thomas Howard succeeded
to the title in 1524 upon the death of his father the 2nd
Duke. One of the last of the `old nobility', Howard found an
early enemy in Cardinal Wolsey, whose destruction he helped to
effect. He was active in battle and diplomacy throughout the
whole of the reign of Henry VIII. He was present at
Flodden ; at the suppression of the `Prentice Riots'
in 1517; in the varying skirmishes against the Scots; in
Spain and France ; and in
Ireland where he was Viceroy for about two
years.
Norfolk rebuilt the huge family mansion at Kenninghall,
near Norwich, because Framlingham, like other castles had become
outdated as a domestic residence. Norfolk's private life was
disturbed by contentions with his second wife, Elizabeth Stafford,
daughter of the 3rd and last Duke of Buckingham. The female effigy
on the tomb is almost certainly that of his first wife Anne,
daughter of Edward IV, who died childless in 1512.
Howard seems to have been as cruel and
uncompromising in his dealings with his relatives as he was with
his enemies in and out of Court, his treatment of the Catholics
during the Pilgrimage of Grace being the subject of an apology from
the King himself. Though he promoted two of his nieces, Anne Boleyn
and Catherine Howard, to be Queens of England for purposes of
family advancement, he felt able to abandon them - and indeed pass
sentence of death on Anne - in their time of need.
At the end of Henry's reign, when the
succession was of doubtful continuance in the light of two
daughters declared bastards and an only son who was sickly,
inter-Court rivalry reached a peak over the protectorate of Edward
(VI). On the one hand were the Seymour brothers, Edward's uncles,
and on the other, Norfolk and his son the Earl of Surrey. Surrey
acted rashly in the matter of armorial bearings and charges of
treason were successfully, if unreasonably, pressed. Surrey lost
his head and his father would similarly have died had not the King
himself died during the night prior to the day fixed for Norfolk's
execution. Howard spent the next six years in the Tower until Mary
was proclaimed Queen at Framlingham itself. She released him – aged
80 – and he died at Kenninghall within the year. His was a
momentous life. He has been called a cruel man … but one who lived
in cruel times. For over thirty years one of the most powerful and
active men in Tudor England, perhaps his greatest triumph was that
he survived in his important offices so close to a despotic King,
dying in his bed and not upon the block.

The tomb of Sir Robert Hitcham, the man who bought the Manors of
Framlingham and Saxtead from Theophilus, 2nd Earl of Suffolk, for
£14000, is to be found in the south aisle of the chancel. It
consists of a black marble slab supported at each corner by the
figure of an angel each having one knee upon the ground. Under the
centre of the slab is a Roman urn and at the west end is the
inscription in gold letters upon black marble which may be clearly
read.
Hitcham was born at Levington near
Ipswich and became a student of law at Pembroke College, Cambridge.
He entered himself at Gray's Inn and soon after, in 1596, obtained
a seat in the House of Commons as MP for West Looe in Cornwall. In
1603 Hitcham was appointed Attorney-General to Anne of Denmark,
Queen Consort to James I, who knighted him upon his further
appointment as King's Senior Sergeant at Law. He retained his high
legal status under Charles I but was not noticeably so prominent in
that King's unhappy reign. He bought a house in Ipswich and spent
the rest of his bachelor days in that town.
Hitcham held his first
court in his newly acquired property of Framlingham in 1635,
and the following year he made his Will and died. Considering
Hitcham's great legal ability during his lifetime, his Will
was an extraordinary document which was virtually impossible
to execute. He instructed that a Poorhouse be erected in
Framlingham, Debenham and Coggeshall. He left money for the
building of a schoolhouse in Framlingham for the poor children
of the above parishes and for the erection of twelve
almshouses for the needy old people of the parishes. He left
the Manors of Framlingham and Saxtead to his old college,
Pembroke. However Hitcham left no provision or suggestion as
to how the poor people of Coggeshall, being 45 miles distant
from Framlingham, or Debenham, being 8 miles away, were to
send their poor children to be educated or their paupers to
work. No provision was made for their maintenance or
habitation while at Framlingham.
In an effort to alleviate the difficulties created by Hitcham's
Will, a petition was sent to Oliver Cromwell's Parliament. Even
today weighty legal matters take much time in their settlement, but
it was not until 1653 that an Ordinance was made for the better
execution of Sir Robert's Will. The outcome was that a Poorhouse
was erected at Framlingham and this building is to be seen today
within the walls of Framlingham Castle. Schools were established at
Framlingham, Debenham and Coggeshall. There are still good primary
schools at the two former places and at Coggeshall an educational
trust helps with the finances of young people entering university
etc. All the ruins within the castle were dispersed leaving only
the curtain wall visible today. The fine almshouses at Framlingham
were erected but the financial benefits which Hitcham's Will
allowed the inhabitants only exist today in the form of free
heating! Nevertheless Sir Robert Hitcham remains a true benefactor
of Framlingham and his great legacy to Pembroke formed the basis of
a warm relationship which still prevails between the collegiate
Lords of the Manor and St Michael's.